Another chapter that jumps around random points, but it somehow seems appropriate to write this chapter. Those closest to me don’t really know what my beliefs are, Zai herself has remarked, “I have no idea what (religion) you are.” So here is a chapter dedicated to the evolution of my beliefs throughout my life.
My earliest encounter with religion that I remember is when I was about eight or nine (1989, 1990). Before that I was baptized Methodist, but I was an infant, so that barely counts. I was playing in the backyard (crazy, I know, bear with me) and I saw my neighbor across the fence gardening. She was an elderly lady with a lush garden of flowers I never seen before. So I started commenting on the flowers.
We were talking (about what, I could only guess, probably how much work raising a garden like that takes) and she mentioned she was going to head to church.
“Church?” I ask, “What’s that?” Its true. At that point in my life, I had never been to church, it wasn’t really part of the Sunday ritual. We didn’t say grace before meals, nor did we pray before bed. Religion was an unknown concept to me at that point.
“Its where you go to worship God.” She replied. God, I had heard of. ‘My God’ and ‘God dammit’ were phrases I had heard around the house, and I knew the basics of ‘Good = Heaven’.
Like the curious kid I was, I ask if I can go to church with her, to which she agreed, as long as my parents were okay with it.
As I look back on this event with an adult’s mind, I can only imagine how surreal it must have been. There’s my mom, come home from a long day at work and cooking up whatever meal, when I, a small child, walk up and ask if I can go to church with our neighbor.
I really don’t remember asking, and I don’t remember what my mom’s reaction was. But she must have agreed, because there I stood on Sunday morning in the finest clothes I owned, with the shirt tucked in, my hair combed and my fingernails clipped (all things I would never do of my own accord).
Stuart and Connie, my neighbors, were as traditional an elderly couple as you can imagine. Their home was decorated with antiques, plastic on the furniture, quiet demeanors, and devout churchgoers. The church they went to was on one of the main roads in Lansing, Illinois, inside a remodled house tucked back from the road a bit. If it weren’t for the sign in front, you’d never know it was a church. The service was held in the living room, and Sunday School upstairs.
I was one of a few children there. The other three being girls. I can’t remember their names, but the oldest one, about the same age as me, had a mild english accent. It was fun because we became something of friends. Sunday School was only half an hour, so we got to play outside while we waited for the main service to be over. All in all, I would say it was a worthwhile experience.
The Religion: Christian Science.
Those two words don’t normally go together, its almost a paradox to use them. But in a nutshell, they believe in the power and protection of God above all else, including modern science and medicine. If you were in danger, if you were sick, God was there. Medicine was the work of man, and unnacceptable.
I’m sure there are finer nuances to the religion, but this is the knowledge carried over from my childhood. Along with the typical biblical teachings, I was taught that medicine was bad, and that there was nothing that the power of God could not cure. It was somewhat ironic, being as I was constantly on medication. Even while at the church, I had some ritalin in me.
But, as the impressionable child I was, I started taking the teachings to heart. I questioned my mother everytime she gave me the pill, asking her why I took medicine if God said it was bad. I’m sure that was more than a mild annoyance. On the plus side, I also no longer tried to sneak home, hiding from older children who might wish to beat me up. I felt the power of God would protect me. Of course, it didn’t, and I still had to defend myself. But the absence of that fear is important, I feel. Despite everything, you should live your life.
I think on some level, I still carry that courage with me.
It was only a matter of time before I was no longer allowed to go to that church. I remember that my mother took my brother and I to a Methodist church a couple times, likely an attempt to give me a taste of our family religion, but I honestly don’t remember a thing.
By the time I was in 8th grade (1995), I was going to church every Sunday, a Methodist church only a few blocks from my mother’s house in Merrillville. I sat in the congregation, I took communion, I sang the hymns, I prayed every night before bed, and I wore a silver cross around my neck.
Yes, folks, I was religious.
I hope you don’t think less of me.
Then a series of events changed my outlook on life (most between 1996-1997). Some of these I’ll delve into in another chapter, and there’s one I’ll keep to myself. People died, people changed, and lifelong family ties were shattered. In the end, I cast the silver cross aside.
I can remember one of the last times I went to church, and one of the reasons why I stopped going. I was a sophomore in high school (1997), sitting there on a warm spring morning, when the pastor began talking of recent events, of how another pastor committed the sin of marrying a gay couple. She went on to say how wrong this was, of how the church should not let such an horrid event repeat. And I thought to myself, “Why the hell not? Why is it so wrong? And why do they see themselves fit to judge others?”
By the time I was a senior (1999), I was a self-described agnostic. I had stopped praying, stopped looking to the sky for answers, and have not been to church in two years, much to my mother’s disappointment. It was during this time that I had a discussion with Jeff, still a good friend of mine, about life and the nature of divinity. Jeff is an atheist, and his views on death in a godless world scared the hell out of me at the time. More and more I thought of the implausability of religion, and while I couldn’t classify myself as an atheist, I was very close to that.
In my second year of college (2002), I learned about Shinto, which is a Japanese religion. Being the japophile I was at the time, I ate it up. There’s deities and mythologies I won’t get into, and many different branches (including Shinto-Christians). But what piqued my interest was Shinto Animism, which is the belief that ALL life is sacred, that the spirit of divinity is everywhere.
So, for awhile, this is how I labelled myself. I can’t really say for how long, but maybe a year or two. I bought a little stone that I carried around engraved with the ‘tree’ symbol, which is commonly worshipped in Shinto.
This was also the first time I distanced myself from Christianity. At first, it was semantic, I just wasn’t Christian. But it didn’t take long for me to hate Christians. Everytime I saw one, they were preaching to me. If they found out I wasn’t Christian, they preached harder, and hurled threats of hell at me.
During my work at Wal-Mart, I had been told I was going to hell many times. Sometimes by co-workers, other times by customers. And in case you’re wondering why my religion somehow got brought up to a customer, this is how it usually went down:
“I like gospel, but your gospel section isn’t very large,” a customer would say.
“Sorry,” I would reply, not really caring. I was wearing a blue vest and listening to some old lady yammer on about gospel music getting paid six dollars an hour, honestly wasn’t into the whole ‘caring’ scene.
“Do you like gospel?” She would ask.
“Ah… I don’t overly care for it,” I would say, being truthful why attempting to skip past the deadly trap being set up.
“What church do you go to?” She would persist.
“I don’t,” I reply again, knowing that the inevitable is coming.
“You don’t!? Don’t you want to show praise to Jesus?” She demands.
“I’m not Christian.”
And then the fireworks would come.
I guess I began to fall out of it when I began to ask myself if I didn’t believe simply because it was Japanese, or whether I only believed in it because it wasn’t Christianity.
On Christianity:
It took me a long time to stop hating Christians and their holier than thou attitude. I have my good friend Paul to thank for that. I’m pretty sure I mentioned it in a past post, but I’ll say it again so its in this little autobiography. Paul is a devout Christian, and has NEVER, not once, ever preached to me. He has never made me feel like I was somehow beneath him, or destined to go to hell. He is helpful and generous, everything an ideal Christian should be. And again, non-judgmental. Knowing him has let me know that not all Christians are out to preach how much better than me they are.
In the years following that, I picked up a little Bhuddism. I never labelled myself as a Bhuddist, but I loved some of the teachings and took them to heart. For example, the freeing of yourself from want, and the belief that all life deserves the same chance to live.
So where am I now? Where do my beliefs lie? Did I go back to being agnostic? Did I got back to Shintoism? Do I worship the Christian God and all His works?
I can say a little of each.
I don’t know whether or not God exists. I like to believe so, there’s a lot of little miracles that we take for granted. I like to believe that a good life follows a good person. I belive in karma, I’ve seen it in action a few times. I believe that there is a bit of spirituality in everything, for better or for worse. I also believe that if Jesus existed, he was a good guy. At worst, he was simply a man who wandered the land preaching peace, acceptance, and understanding to a land that truly needed it, taking his beliefs so far as to die for them. So even at worst, he’s a man worth taking a cue from.
So, I’m not sure what you’d call someone such as me. Can’t say I really belong to any religion, but I’ve always been something of a loner, so perhaps that’s okay. But at the very least, maybe those few who read this and were curious, can get a little bit of insight on the workings of my mind.
David N. Scott | 24-Jul-07 at 10:20 pm | Permalink
Hey, I don’t know about Christian and science being a paradox. After all…
[Insert several dozen post long flame war here]
Seriously, though, all you can do with something like this is say what’s happened to you and all a reader can say is that it’s interesting and well-written, which it was.
Zel-kun | 25-Jul-07 at 5:43 am | Permalink
Haha. I thought that if I had more readers, SOMETHING in there would produce flame.
BTW, I said ALMOST a paradox, heh.
And thanks for the compliment too!
Sabrejack | 25-Jul-07 at 11:08 am | Permalink
Yep, yep.. well-written. Most of my friends have some sort of thought-out process behind their belief structure, and I respect that. In my life, the type of evangelism that I despise is the uninformed kind.. The people who have no reason for believing the way they do other than that they were taught it since birth. Believe what you want, but please, at least have the guts to examine your faith and decide what you believe for yourself.
Verndigger | 25-Jul-07 at 11:56 am | Permalink
Hi, Zel - most interesting, reading about your theological travels!
and for me, a longtime student of Christian Science, *specially* where they began!
Perhaps it’s time to check out those beginnings more thoroughly, by getting a copy of Science and Health, and reading it.
who knows, you might like it!
BTW, you can read it on line at several different spots - one is http://www.spiriduality.com
regards,
Verndigger
Zel-kun | 25-Jul-07 at 1:24 pm | Permalink
Hmm, that link doesn’t seem to work. I’ll be sure to try it out later. Its always good to see a new name in the comments, though! Welcome!
Sabrejack | 26-Jul-07 at 11:46 am | Permalink
Let’s just get a little counter-argument going here.. since this is directly relevant to “christian science”:
http://www.whywontgodhealamputees.com/
The premise is that modern, educated doctors believe God is answering prayers and causing medical miracles, curing people of their ailments.. but we never see a medical miracle for anything outright obvious, such as an amputee regrowing their limb. God works in mysterious ways, I guess!
Anyhow, overall the arguments and tone could use some work, but it’s bound to get some people riled up, so I thought I’d post it.
Zel-kun | 26-Jul-07 at 12:20 pm | Permalink
That’s an interesting little piece of reading there.
David N. Scott | 28-Jul-07 at 6:49 pm | Permalink
Believe what you want, but please, at least have the guts to examine your faith and decide what you believe for yourself.
I agree with that.
http://www.whywontgodhealamputees.com/
I find that site a little silly. Maybe it’s the repetition of asking if it’s instantly made you an atheist on multiple pages or the hypothetical little kid’s reaction to communion (which, despite many years of church-attendance, I am yet to see), but I thought it took itself way too seriously.
(assuming I’m thinking of the correct site–these things do run together after a while).
It’s actually an amusingly modern argument in it’s own way–it makes God out to be prejiduced against the handicapped, which has sort of only existed as a caategory of person very recently.
There are, of course, an immeasurable amount of horrors that can be laid at God’s doorstep, especially if you go the standard omni-route in description. For what it’s worth, I think the omni-potent/omniscient definition actually fails on both a logical level and doesn’t seem to match the Bible, which actually does not lack statements of God being unable to do some thing or another.
For instance:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2013:55-59;&version=31;
…there, Jesus is rejected by the old neighborhood, who doesn’t buy him as the Messiah. The last line is: “And he did not do many miracles there because of their lack of faith.”
That’s a pretty substantial limitation, there.
Personally, God healing amputees seems to fall outside of my general parameters of miraculous things, probably because it’s too blatant. I suppose that is unfair in some abstract sense of the word (though perhaps not any less fair than the people that didn’t survive similar injuries–anything that results in amputation would likely have a chance of death)
…but it would prove more that God had limitations then that God does not exist. Assuming you could really say no one every claims to have had an arm regrown. Which I do mildly doubt, and a counter-example tingles deep down in my mind. I’ll have to keep that in mind for future research.
Amusingly enough, Sunday’s sermon was taught by this guy:
http://www.myspace.com/lifewithoutlimbs
…his name is Nick, and he has no arms or legs. He credits his faith with his ability to lead as normal a life as one can imagine under the circumstances. Pretty inspiring guy.
…personally, I prefer something like that to theological hair splitting anyway. There are certainly plenty of amputee Christian and other faithful, so obviously people who have actually lived the experience rather than commenting on it from afar have managed to assimilate it. They would know better than me, anyway.
David N. Scott | 28-Jul-07 at 6:53 pm | Permalink
Proof in point:
http://www.whywontgodhealamputees.com/god12.htm
This part quotes a few Bible verses saying the Word of God is perfect, and then says that it means the Bible is perfect.
Of course, the Bible as we have it hadn’t even been written yet. So, obviously this is silly on it’s face.
Not that plenty of pastors wouldn’t make the same argument…
David N. Scott | 28-Jul-07 at 6:53 pm | Permalink
Theology makes me long-winded. I’ll shush now.
David N. Scott | 28-Jul-07 at 7:01 pm | Permalink
Argh, theology makes me long-winded. I will be silent now.
p.s. one of the Gospels is attributed to a physician, the GOod Samaritan gives the wounded man first aid, and the bible compares God to a physician at least once. I think the concept of healing instead of medical science is a foolish and dangerous addition.
Sabrejack | 30-Jul-07 at 11:26 am | Permalink
Yeah.. your points are why I felt the argument needed work. He also has a tendency to appeal to the viewer’s fear of being thought of as “stupid” or “illogical.” I think people innately sense the weak argument he makes, supported by tricks and tactics, and it infuriates believers because they feel they should be able to refute this man so easily.. but they’re trapped into the argument’s claims by their belief in an omnipotent being and his infallible holy book.
Anyhow, for me, prayer and faith healing is a matter of Occam’s razor.
I think he does better on his “milk jug” argument, even if he does still sound like a pompous ass.
Zel-kun | 30-Jul-07 at 1:39 pm | Permalink
I didn’t read the whole sit, but I spent a good half hour or so reading it. He makes a valid point in trying to analyze divine power, but falls short when he attempts to support his arguments with biblical quotes.
The bible was written by man, and as such, distorted by man. So all he really proved was that the bible may be a little innaccurate.
The bible inaccurate? No WAI!
*ahem*